Tag Archives: Edinburgh Council

Draft Minute of Living Streets Edinburgh Group (LSEG) Annual General Meeting 2025

Public Event,

Date:-  Thursday 29th May 2025.

Location:- Quaker Meeting House, Victoria Street, Edinburgh.

Present:-  Mike Birch, Roger Colkett, Robert Ainsworth, Patrick Miner, Johanna Jokio, Peter Brown, Mark Jacunski, Councillor Chas Booth, Andrew Heald, John McKenna, Rosemary Burton, Ruth Findlay, Jane Brown, John Russell, Isobel Leckie, Stephen Jenkinson, Harry Garrod, Mark Boggis, Morag Jones, Rachael Revesz, David Hunter, Hilda Sim, Kirsty Sangster, Ashleigh & Kirin (Lothian Centre for Inclusive Living), Rosie Sinclair & Mairi (Equal Footing Porty).

Meeting Started:-  18.35 hrs

David Hunter (LSEG Convener) chaired the meeting.

  1.  Apologies were received from Harald Tobermann (EBUG) and Anja Wolf.
  • The draft Minutes of the LSEG 2024 AGM were approved. There were no questions or matters arising.
  • The LSEG Treasurer Isobel Leckie presented the accounts. Isobel reported a balance of £680.61.  Expenditure over the year 2024/2025 was only £134.75 This was almost exclusively on room hire plus minimal bank charges.
  • David Hunter presented the Convener’s Report. The past year had been very busy with some successes.  Many opportunities also remained to be tackled. 
  • Rachael Revesz talked about the campaign she had been involved with over the last couple of years for the successful Leith LTN.
  • David Hunter summarised how LSEG had been organised over the last few years. A committee had been in place, but this had changed to a more informal network.  The plan for the future was to try to share the workload amongst a team. 

Names were noted of volunteers who are prepared to attend an initial team planning meeting:-  Mike Birch, Mark Boggis, Hilda Sim, Rachael Revesz, Roger Colkett, Johanna Jokio, John Russell, & Isobel Leckie.

Isobel Leckie was re-appointed as Treasurer.

David Hunter said he was willing to remain in the role of Convener but that he would like to transition out of the role across the next year.

Hilda Sim proposed a vote of thanks to David Hunter for his hard work on behalf of pedestrians. This sentiment was warmly applauded by the meeting. 

  • Councillor Stephen Jenkinson, Convener of the City of Edinburgh Transport and Environment Committee, gave a short talk about recent work undertaken by the committee relating to pedestrians.
  • Ashleigh and Kirin of the Lothian Centre for Inclusive Living talked to the meeting about the realities of travelling around Edinburgh if you use a wheelchair or have impaired vision.
  • Councillor Jenkinson answered about a dozen questions from the meeting on a variety of pedestrian related topics including Street Design Guidance, the lack of pedestrian data, Bus Stop improvement programme, TVL funding & vehicle idling fines

Meeting Closed:-  20.05hrs

Mark Boggis/30.05.2025

“We are all pedestrians”: Transport convener addresses Living Streets Edinburgh AGM

Council Policy, Public Event, , , ,

Following criticism about “vanity prestige projects” being prioritised over pedestrian access, Stephen Jenkinson addressed our AGM

Edinburgh Council’s Transport Convener has sought to reassure Living Streets Edinburgh Group supporters that pedestrian access is a top priority for his committee.

“We need to ensure that we keep [pedestrians] front of our minds and decision-making when we implement projects and developments across the city,” Stephen Jenkinson, Convener of the Transport and Environment Committee at Edinburgh Council, told the volunteer group.

The comments at our AGM on 29 May follow concerns that the committee has given the go-ahead to what our convener David Hunter named “vanity prestige projects”, rather than focus on less expensive but more beneficial, pedestrian-focused projects.

Jenkinson acknowledged the concerns and added: “I would challenge that in a little way. I think the City Mobility Plan, in a grand sense, is about delivering big projects. The scope of a lot of those projects will include pedestrian and public realm benefits.”

The convener said that when he took over from his predecessor, Scott Arthur, now MP for Edinburgh South West, he discovered a large list of proposed projects listed under the 10-year City Mobility Plan, and tasked council officers to prioritise them.

He explained that many schemes have to compete with other local authorities for external funding, and the funding framework has moved from multi-year to single-year.

“I want to reassure you that pedestrian priority is a priority not only for me but many members of the committee and the council. It isn’t a zero-sum game when it comes to moving people and vehicles around the city,” he added.

Helping everyone to get around the city

The need for pedestrian priority is urgent. Two disabled person’s rights advocates from the Lothian Centre for Inclusive Learning – Ashleigh and Kirin – told the AGM that floating bus stops, incorrectly placed dropped kerbs, a lack of space around disabled parking bays, and cycle lanes in the middle of pavements, all hinder those with sight and mobility issues.

Kirin, who has sight issues, praised the banning of advertising boards – a campaign led by Living Streets – but said there is still a lot of street furniture to navigate.

“I just want to get around the streets, just like you, but it’s trickier because I can’t see as well,” she said.

Kirin also joked about using her cane: “The pavement parking ban has been very helpful which has stopped us from scraping your cars!”

Positive noises from the TEC?

Jenkinson pointed out:

  • £4-6 million funding will be invested in the Granton Liveable Neighbourhood scheme, which will bring pedestrian benefits.
  • the 2025/26 budget for dropped kerbs has doubled to £400,000, thanks to Transport Scotland funding.
  • in response to concern that the council has frozen the footway budget this year, Jenkinson said the budget has increased 25% since 2022.
  • the success of the pavement parking ban means footways will generally see less wear and tear from vehicles.

Engine idling: Will the council act?

Jenkinson said he had also written to the Scottish Government to advocate for higher fixed penalty notices for engine idling, which currently stands at £20 and would not cover the cost of enforcing the fine.

In contrast, fixed penalty notices for pavement parking stand at £100 and have generated more than £244,000 in revenue for the 12 months ending February 2025 alone.

Living Streets Edinburgh convener David Hunter thanked Jenkinson for standing strong on no exemptions for pavement parking and for attempting to answer audience questions:

  • Will the Council monitor pedestrian movement, and use that data?
  • Will the Council follow other countries like the Netherlands and re-design junctions like Toll Cross before resurfacing them?
  • Will the Council re-consider removing the Braidswoods modal filters, which have successfully reduced daily vehicles from 10,000 to 6,000?
  • Will the Gorgie Liveable Neighbourhood retract its proposal to include floating bus stops?

Watch this space.

LSEG calls (again) for more investment in everyday walking

Council Policy, News, Press Release, , , ,

The Council’s Transport and Environment Committee on 22 May will consider a report recommending priorities to deliver the City Mobility Plan. We’re surprised, and very disappointed, to see no mention of some key initiatives which we were able to get included in the CMP delivery plan. Especially disappointing after the committee decided to freeze footway maintenance while increasing spending on roads, only last month. We’ve therefore sent councillors this message.

Dear Councillor

I’m writing in connection with the report on City Mobility Plan priorities, Item 7.5 on the TEC agenda for 22 May bit.ly/43ktlep  The recommendations do not adequately reflect the CMP’s ambition to effect “a transformational change in walking and wheeling in Edinburgh”.

Over two years ago, two new initiatives were introduced into the Active Travel component of the City Mobility Plan: ‘Action for Better Crossings” (ABC) and the “Edinburgh Accessible Streets Initiative” EASI). These programmes (both proposed by us) finally offered the prospect of a strategic, rather than piecemeal, approach to addressing some of the most fundamental problems with getting around the city as a pedestrian – for example:

  • the time that you have to wait for the green man at traffic lights,
  • the thousands of missing dropped kerbs on pavements,
  • narrow footways, 
  • pavement clutter, etc.

As we understand it, effectively nothing has been done yet to implement either initiative as a coherent programme. We had hoped that they would form a key part of this report. However, there is no mention whatsoever in the report of either ABC or EASI, despite Council having confirmed them as at the heart of CMP policy only last year (see attached).

Instead, some elements of ABC and EASI are simply noted as part of the ‘rolling programme’ in Appendix 4b. Paragraph 4.14 of the report states an expectation that these will be funded at “an overall level roughly equal to recent overall investment”. This isn’t good enough: there is no indication of how much money is budgeted for these schemes; certainly there has been no systematic investment at all in recent years in widening footways. Many of the other aspects like the pedestrian crossing programme and the crucial school streets reviews have huge backlogs owing to lack of resourcing.

These vital programmes need to be considered alongside, and on the same level playing field, as the active travel and public transport listed in Appendix 1. Councillors should be able to consider whether investment in school streets, road safety, ABC or EASI is more or less worthy than these projects, whether they be George Street, Hawthornvale-Salamander Street, the Lindsey Bridge or Dalry 20 Minute Neighbourhood. Otherwise the opportunity to consider where best to invest both staff time and capital funding is lost and a ‘silo’ approach is entrenched.

We also have serious concerns with the overly-complex methodology for assessing projects in Appendix 1. It gives no weighting to walking and wheeling (“top of the travel hierarchy”) and doesn’t sufficiently value schemes relatively modest but important to pedestrians such as Calton Road and the Causey. These projects fail to score highly enough only because work on them has already been “paused’ for years.

However, the fundamental weakness of the report is to take too narrow an approach to evaluating a limited set of projects. We would therefore like to see the report deferred perhaps for two cycles, and a new report brought forward with a more strategic approach to future investment, including the programmes mentioned above.

David Hunter

Convener

Pedestrian crossing reports: Blackhall and Gardners Crescent

Council Policy, Street Audit, , , , ,

We have two new reports on our observations from the pedestrian’s point of view on two more road junctions. As so often, people walking have to wait too long to cross – this not only discourages walking but also encourages people to cross unsafely. Especially worrying is the lack of any ‘green man’ phase at Blackhall (a problem until recently at Gardners Crescent too). We’re encouraging the City of Edinburgh Council to invest much more in traffic signals so that they better reflect the ‘sustainable travel hierarchy’ (which has walking and wheeling firmly at the top).

Blackhall Junction

Blackhall

LSEG-Blackhall-Sep-2024-1Download

Morrison Street

LSEG-Morrison-Street-2024Download

Edinburgh campaigners call for £83 million boost for walking 

Press Release, , ,

Media statement

Transport Scotland has yet to decide how to spend £83 million of its active travel budget in the current (2024/25) financial year. The figures have been revealed by the Edinburgh group of Living Streets, the national campaign for everyday walking and wheeling, after a Freedom of Information request. 

The figures show that while councils have been earmarked for £38 million, and other agencies promoting cycling and walking are set to receive £99 million, this leaves a shortfall of £83 million – 38% – still to be allocated from the £220 million active travel budget.  

David Hunter, Convener of the Living Streets Edinburgh group said “The whole active travel funding picture seems like a complete mess – so many different public agencies and charities receive significant sums without any apparent logic or coordination. Amid all the recent changes in the way the Scottish Government has been allocating this money, it’s alarming to see that there now appears to be a shortfall of more than a third of the budget as we head toward the half-way mark in the financial year. 

“What we’d really like to see is a much more focussed commitment to investing in Scotland’s pedestrian infrastructure which is so often in a dreadful condition. These budgeted funds should be released as soon as possible to local authorities so that they can spend them on active travel priorities as they see fit. Councils are best placed to make these decisions and in Edinburgh, this funding would go a long way to improving facilities for pedestrians through desperately needed measures like improving pavements and pedestrian crossings. For example, adding a pedestrian phase to the traffic lights at Leslie Place/Deanhaugh Street, Stockbridge is now more than five years late.”

According to Sustrans Scotland, some 40% of Edinburgh’s pavements don’t even meet the minimum width, while it’s understood that there are nearly 17,000 missing or substandard ‘dropped kerbs’.  Improving pedestrian facilities benefits everyone and would be a simple and effective use of these unspent Scottish Government funds.

Documents:-

Active Travel funding 2024 – 2025

FoI 202400420711 Funding figures

FOI Response