Tag Archives: Edinburgh Council

Comments received from the public on Pedestrian Crossings, April 2026

The following table records feedback which we received through emails and social media on the experiences of pedestrians at ‘stand-alone’ crossings (‘Pelicans’, ‘Puffins’ etc.) This follows reports to the Transport and Environment Committee on 2 April that 24 pedestrian crossings were to be changed, having been found to have excessive ‘wait times’ for people wanting to cross the road (Item 8.3 https://democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?MId=7659.)

We are asking Council staff to investigate the crossings listed below, many of which still don’t seem to meet council standards. In particular, they should:

  • conform to the maximum 20 seconds wait time for  pedestrians, and;
  • the green man should come on ‘on demand’ So long as speed limits are 30mph or less).

This feedback is reported verbatim as received. Some of these reported problems appear to relate to traffic signalled junctions, which operate differently. Where possible, we have tried to match the reported locations of the crossings with the Site ID as recorded in Appendix 1 of the Committee report to help council staff investigate issues, although these should be checked.

In addition, we received a lot of general positive feedback (“well done”, “good start; lots more to do”, etc.) and also several requests for a ‘countdown’ system at lights.

IDVerbatim comments from the public
313Broughton Road pedestrian crossing outside Tesco is very slow. 
 St Johns Rd Corstorphine outside the Post Office. Take sandwiches and a flask !!!
631Toucan crossing outside St Mary’s Cathedral – it was mentioned by a few people when you first asked about this because there’s almost no point pressing the button. It only turns red for traffic once all the traffic has gone, and the council have never replied to any of my queries about it.
 It is 70 seconds on Slateford Road. Sometimes longer if you happen to push the button just after the change of lights on Robertson Avenue.
 Who’s testing these? The one further down Comiston Road at the parade of shops only goes green when no cars are coming
 Thats a bit weird. My experience with the ones on Craigentinny Road is that when you press the button its just a few seconds before the green man comes on so ive never ever encountered a problem.
 Good start, Next, Queensferry Road at Clermiston Road Queensferry Road at Quality Street/Craigcrook Road
 How about Princes Street and Tollcross? The wait times are terrible, never mind that there’s not enough time to cross.
 Princes Street is particularly bad
353?Crewe Road south one feels more like 20mins just now so it’s good to see it being included in this plan. Currently it encourages pedestrians to take risks to catch buses stopping opposite.
300?Never waited more than 20 seconds at Whitehill street the old traffic lights or new ones installed towards the end of last year
 Princes Street at South St David Street is ridiculously slow with large numbers of people having to wait to cross.
 Still 4 mins (2x 2 min crossings to cross the whole carriageway) at Queensferry Road at Braehead Avenue
333Green man is not “on demand” and 30 seconds wait at Holyrood Road (Paterson’s Land)
 The Morrisons one on Ferry Road isn’t slow in the slightest
 Maybe sort out the crossing at Hope Park Crescent at it operates a green man without a pedestrian there causing a gridlock!
 We’ve got one in Stockbridge that doesn’t beep and there’s no high up green man. its amazing how many people don’t realise the green man is on. Absolutely useless for the hard of hearing.
 St John’s Road outside the White Lady and the Post Office are shockingly bad. Over a minute wait at both!
 Next Queensferry Rd at Blackhall library. Press Button, waits minutes until road is empty, then goes red. You’ve crossed when the road is empty. Drivers then annoyed that no-one crosses on red light. Nonsense!
 Bonnington Toll (Bonnington Rd, Pirig St/Newhaven Road)! That one’s an absolute joke. You don’t just wait more than 20 seconds, you can wait a good few minutes!
370?The green man on Colinton Road at the Tennis Centre does not operate ‘on demand’

LSEG

April 2026

“Barnton Connections’: comments by LSE

This is the formal response by Living Streets Edinburgh (LSEG) to the consultation on the ‘Barnton Connections’ active travel proposals closing on 9 February 2026.

We agree with the aim of connecting Maybury Road to NCN 1, and also improving the ability to cross Queensferry Road by walking and wheeling, especially in view of the massive increase in housing in the Cammo/West Craigs areas and consequent need to promote sustainable travel options in the area. We recognise that this is a very challenging brief given the amount of traffic using Barnton junction.

We provisionally support the proposals, with one specific exception regarding bus stops (see below). We say “provisionally” for three reasons: firstly because we understand that no modelling of pedestrian movement has been undertaken; without understanding how pedestrian movement is affected, for better or worse, we can’t provide definitive comment on the plans. This modelling should be an essential exercise in any major junction change.

Secondly, the proposals do not seem to include any new bus priority measures. In view of the importance of the A90 as the principal road link between Fife and Edinburgh, the focus on cycling, walking and wheeling on a north/south axis seems narrow: a wider brief which includes general traffic and especially public transport as well as pedestrian and cycle links would seem appropriate.

Finally we wonder, in view of all these complexities as well as expense and disruption, whether Maybury Road-Whitehouse Road directly across the Barnton Junction is the most sensible route to link cyclists from the south of the A 90 to NCN1. We note that the Cramond Barnton and Cammo Community Council suggest that a number of alternative routes may be more appropriate to connect key cycle links. We do not feel in a position to support or oppose this suggestion but believe that it should be looked at carefully.

Turning to specific aspects of the presented design, we would make the following comments:

We especially welcome the cycle/pedestrian route over Queensferry Road at the west side of the Barnton junction changing from a 4-phase to a 2-phase crossing, which we expect should enhance pedestrian movement significantly. We would ideally like to see improved crossing opportunities to the east of the junction as well.

Other welcome aspects include the new signalised crossing on Maybury Road at Cammo Gardens, particularly given the amount of new housing development in the area and the volume of traffic on Maybury Road. We are pleased to see some pedestrian build-outs which improve side road junctions, for example at Barnton Avenue West/Brae Park, Barnton Grove and Queensferry Road itself. The removal of hatching on Whitehouse Road allows a better use of the carriageway, especially as we understand the speed limit is to rightly be reduced to 20mph. A lot of space at Barnton junction itself is unpleasant with excessive guard rails and new planting would be welcome. The walking routes and space at the shops and past the Royal Burgess Golf Society are currently poor and would be made more pedestrian-friendly by these proposals.

The switch of the cycle lane from the west to the east side of Whitehouse Road just north of the shops looks odd. Presumably this is to minimise the number of side road junctions interacting with the cycle lane: however, most northbound cyclists heading from Barnton towards South Queensferry or Cramond would surely continue to use the road rather than cross over to the cycleway (and then back again)?

On the negative side, there appears to be little if any, general footway widening except at some junction build-outs. Indeed there seems to be a slight reduction in many footway widths. The ‘criss-crossing’ of the pavements by cycle ways at junctions (including Barnton Junction) should be avoided: many pedestrians, especially those who are older, less mobile or have sensory impairments, value pavements as spaces where they feel safe from potential conflict with any vehicle, including bicycles.

We are disappointed to see two new ‘floating’ bus stops installed on Whitehouse Road; we receive regular feedback that these are a problem for older and disabled people, especially visually impaired. The northern-most bus stop has no footway at all, so requires pedestrians to cross the cycleway twice to move along the pavement, even if they aren’t catching a bus. This is a clear breach of council ESDG standards; we would therefore like to see conventional bus stops retained.

February 2026

Living Streets webinar on Local Place Plans

The webinar on Local Place Plans has now taken place. You can watch the webinar here:-

Local Place Plan webinar – from Living Streets Edinburgh

It’s time for our first webinar of the year! It’s for anyone interested in Local Place Plans, and how they can positively impact your community. You might be working on one already.

A Local Place Plan allows you to shape the future of your local area by creating a plan that addresses local needs or concerns. All LPPs must be submitted by September 2026 and will be considered by the Council as it develops the City Plan 2040.

LPPs include things like:

  • where new homes will be built and what kind of homes are built
  • providing services that people need within easy reach
  • making sure there are enough places of work within the city
  • improving walking, wheeling and cycling routes and access to public transport
  • supporting residents physical and mental wellbeing
  • protecting the natural environment
  • responding to the climate crisis, such as adapting to increased flood risk

Improving walking and wheeling routes is our bread and butter, and we want to empower community councils and groups to work on and submit their LLPs before September.

For the webinar we have two speakers:

  • Anna Grant of the development planning team, Edinburgh Council
  • Joanna McClelland, accredited conservation architect and founder of EALA Impacts, the not-for-profit built environment consultants Followed by a Q&A.

Worried about the September deadline?

We will also cover the Council’s ‘call for ideas’ starting in July – meaning that everyone can contribute to their community’s well-being, whether or not you will submit an LLP. Join us to find out more.

Put pedestrians first in active travel schemes, say walking campaigners

Walking campaigners Living Streets Edinburgh have called for the Council to put pedestrians first in new active travel schemes – as council policy states. The call comes as the group criticises plans for Dundee Street which would see large sections of busy pavement narrowed to accommodate new cycleways. The group has learnt that pavements would be reduced in at least 12 locations, in some places by as much as 2.4 metres. One pavement (at the Edinburgh Printmakers) would be left little more than a metre wide.

David Hunter, the group’s Convener, said: ”Despite a £10 million price tag, the plans for Dundee Street would not only leave many pavements below the minimum width recognised in both local and national guidance, they would actually reduce pavement space.

“New cycle lanes shouldn’t come from walking space. We’ve already seen how pedestrian space was squeezed out in Leith Walk, and Dundee Street would make the same mistake. We really need to see the Council stick to its own policy – that means putting pedestrians’ needs first, above other road users.”

Living Streets also criticises the lack of pedestrian improvements at Boroughmuir, Tollcross and Craiglockhart schools, and the introduction of nine ‘floating’ bus stops, which means that passengers have to cross a cycle way to get on or off a bus. 

Living Streets Edinburgh Group supports the provision of alternative routes for cyclists to the Union Canal towpath, but suggests this should be achieved using traffic-free and quiet streets in Shandon and North Merchiston rather than on Dundee Street. Their full response is here: https://bit.ly/3LbYDPi

***

Note to Editors: this is the link to the council’s public consultation on the scheme, which closes on 12 January 2026 bit.ly/4nOpDCN