Category Archives: News

Living Streets Edinburgh Group: Manifesto for 2027 Council elections

Maintain the position that “walking and wheeling are top of the sustainable travel hierarchy” and adhere to this hierarchy in every respect: street design, traffic management, budgets, maintenance, management of city streets.

Introduce an immediate increase in the pavement maintenance budget of £500,000 and commit to spending at least 25% of future roads maintenance budgets on footways.*

Review pedestrian waiting and crossing times at all traffic lights in the city and invest in smart signals to enhance efficient, sustainable mobility for everyone.

Respect pedestrian space by actively managing pavements to keep them clear of obstructions like roadworks signs, bins, hedges, old railings and other clutter.

Adopt a fresh approach to active travel programmes. Move away from  grand expensive schemes designed by consultants, and instead focus on smaller schemes, delivered in-house, which prioritise road safety, accessibility, travel to school and access to public transport.

Deliver a new City Mobility Plan/Transport Strategy based on practical, achievable measures to reduce traffic and encourage sustainable travel.

  • The annual footway maintenance budget is currently £3.500 million, which is 19% of the total roads budget of £18.467 million.

Deputation to Transport and Environment Committee, 12 November 2026 by the Living Streets Edinburgh Group

Item 7.8 Capital Investment Programme Annual Update: ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’

Living Streets Edinburgh Group is the local voluntary arm of the national charity campaigning for better conditions for everyday walking and wheeling.

We are asking TEC to approve funding for the ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’ scheme as part of the review of capital priorities. This would make small-scale local improvements to streets – things like widening narrow pavements, fixing dropped kerbs and improving junctions – the kind of things which people across the city want to see.

TEC decided which active travel schemes should ‘proceed’ or pause’ last May. ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’ ranked 71st in the evaluation matrix, just missing out on ‘proceeding’ by a single point, largely because it was ascribed an extremely high (but arbitrary) budget of £44 million. In our view, this would be the single most important of any active travel scheme in improving conditions for walking and wheeling in Edinburgh: much more so than many expensive, highly-engineered schemes which were ranked higher.

However at that meeting, TEC also agreed to receive an update on:

a) the equality and poverty impacts of the reprioritisation exercise and whether the prioritisation needs to be adjusted to better promote accessibility and poverty reduction

b) whether any larger projects (in excess of £10m) that have been paused could be split into smaller elements to allow some elements to be delivered.”

So we are disappointed that the report to TEC (Appendix 7) continues to recommend ‘pausing’ Liveable Neighbourhoods. This is hard to understand given that the whole rationale of the scheme is to split street improvements into manageable local packages. 

We understand that there are around 17,000 (!) missing or inadequate dropped kerbs in the city.  A City Mobility Plan KPI (#30) is to deliver 400 per year. But we’re told that the Council’s Active Travel team, which holds the central dropped kerb budget, delivered kerbs at only 8 sites in 2025/26 (we acknowledge that other teams, like road maintenance, will also have made improvements). A similar mismatch applies to pavements: hundreds of city pavements are less than the minimum acceptable width specified in both local and national guidance.

In the face of these challenges, the current rolling programmes cannot deliver the Council’s big ambitions for Edinburgh’s streets. Not for the first time, we also see a need to reiterate the agreed transport hierarchy – which has walking and wheeling at the top.

We therefore ask councillors to look again at ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’ and to now approve a pared-down budget. This would potentially benefit residents in every ward and deliver many equality and poverty impacts that councillors want to see across the city.

November 2026

LSEG deputation on A-boards, September 2026

Deputation to Transport and Environment Committee, 10 September 2026 by the Living Streets Edinburgh Group

Item 7.3: Petition for Consideration – Make Edinburgh Tables and Chairs Charges Fair and Introduce Licensed A Boards for Local Businesses

Living Streets Edinburgh Group is the local voluntary arm of the national charity, Living Streets, which campaigns for better conditions for everyday walking and wheeling.

‘Pavement clutter’ is a significant problem on Edinburgh streets, with trade waste bins, roadworks debris and overhanging hedges among the many problems that pedestrians face on a daily basis. As so often, it is blind, older and less mobile pedestrians who are worst affected by obstructions encountered on the pavement. We regularly highlight these problems, for example: https://www.livingstreetsedinburgh.org.uk/2020/12/11/cut-the-pavement-clutter/.

We therefore strongly oppose the request in the petition that advertising ‘A-boards’ should once again be permitted, under licence, on city streets.  We played a leading role in persuading the Council to introduce the ban on A-boards and other temporary advertising structures in 2019. We urge councillors to maintain the ban, which the Council has by and large enforced well, adopting a consistent and fair approach for all businesses.

We agree with the petitioners that outdoor seating can bring life to streets and we have no objection to ‘tables and chairs’ on the pavement in principle. However it is essential that  they leave adequate space for pedestrians and follow Council’s guidance on their layout. This means effective management and where required enforcement by Council officers. We have no comment as to whether or not the level of fees charged for permits is reasonable.

David Hunter

Convener

August 2026

Council action against Trade Waste bins (FoI response)

Trade Waste

Thank you for your request for information of 03/04/2026 which  has been processed and considered under the Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004 (EIRs).  The information is provided below.

With regards to Trade Waste, please provide the following information for each of the three years 2023/24, 2024/25 and 2025/26:

How many penalty notices were issued for contravention of Right Time, Right Place policies?

What was the total of penalties issued?

What was the total of ££ collected (i.e. paid)?

No. of FPNs issuedFPN Overall TotalFPN payment Received
2023/2024123£9840£6080
2024/2025 *123£29800£16200
2025/202666£33,000£20,000

* The FPN amount was increased by the Scottish Government from £200 to £500 and implemented from November 2024.

Comments received from the public on Pedestrian Crossings, April 2026

The following table records feedback which we received through emails and social media on the experiences of pedestrians at ‘stand-alone’ crossings (‘Pelicans’, ‘Puffins’ etc.) This follows reports to the Transport and Environment Committee on 2 April that 24 pedestrian crossings were to be changed, having been found to have excessive ‘wait times’ for people wanting to cross the road (Item 8.3 https://democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?MId=7659.)

We are asking Council staff to investigate the crossings listed below, many of which still don’t seem to meet council standards. In particular, they should:

  • conform to the maximum 20 seconds wait time for  pedestrians, and;
  • the green man should come on ‘on demand’ So long as speed limits are 30mph or less).

This feedback is reported verbatim as received. Some of these reported problems appear to relate to traffic signalled junctions, which operate differently. Where possible, we have tried to match the reported locations of the crossings with the Site ID as recorded in Appendix 1 of the Committee report to help council staff investigate issues, although these should be checked.

In addition, we received a lot of general positive feedback (“well done”, “good start; lots more to do”, etc.) and also several requests for a ‘countdown’ system at lights.

IDVerbatim comments from the public
313Broughton Road pedestrian crossing outside Tesco is very slow. 
 St Johns Rd Corstorphine outside the Post Office. Take sandwiches and a flask !!!
631Toucan crossing outside St Mary’s Cathedral – it was mentioned by a few people when you first asked about this because there’s almost no point pressing the button. It only turns red for traffic once all the traffic has gone, and the council have never replied to any of my queries about it.
 It is 70 seconds on Slateford Road. Sometimes longer if you happen to push the button just after the change of lights on Robertson Avenue.
 Who’s testing these? The one further down Comiston Road at the parade of shops only goes green when no cars are coming
 Thats a bit weird. My experience with the ones on Craigentinny Road is that when you press the button its just a few seconds before the green man comes on so ive never ever encountered a problem.
 Good start, Next, Queensferry Road at Clermiston Road Queensferry Road at Quality Street/Craigcrook Road
 How about Princes Street and Tollcross? The wait times are terrible, never mind that there’s not enough time to cross.
 Princes Street is particularly bad
353?Crewe Road south one feels more like 20mins just now so it’s good to see it being included in this plan. Currently it encourages pedestrians to take risks to catch buses stopping opposite.
300?Never waited more than 20 seconds at Whitehill street the old traffic lights or new ones installed towards the end of last year
 Princes Street at South St David Street is ridiculously slow with large numbers of people having to wait to cross.
 Still 4 mins (2x 2 min crossings to cross the whole carriageway) at Queensferry Road at Braehead Avenue
333Green man is not “on demand” and 30 seconds wait at Holyrood Road (Paterson’s Land)
 The Morrisons one on Ferry Road isn’t slow in the slightest
 Maybe sort out the crossing at Hope Park Crescent at it operates a green man without a pedestrian there causing a gridlock!
 We’ve got one in Stockbridge that doesn’t beep and there’s no high up green man. its amazing how many people don’t realise the green man is on. Absolutely useless for the hard of hearing.
 St John’s Road outside the White Lady and the Post Office are shockingly bad. Over a minute wait at both!
 Next Queensferry Rd at Blackhall library. Press Button, waits minutes until road is empty, then goes red. You’ve crossed when the road is empty. Drivers then annoyed that no-one crosses on red light. Nonsense!
 Bonnington Toll (Bonnington Rd, Pirig St/Newhaven Road)! That one’s an absolute joke. You don’t just wait more than 20 seconds, you can wait a good few minutes!
370?The green man on Colinton Road at the Tennis Centre does not operate ‘on demand’

LSEG

April 2026