Category Archives: News

Living Streets Edinburgh Group: our asks for Holyrood 2026 elections

Living Streets Edinburgh campaigns to make walking and wheeling better, safer and more accessible in Edinburgh. We support national calls for the Scottish Parliament to give more priority to active travel and have four specific changes we want parties and candidates for the elections to commit to:

  1. Engine idling

The penalty for breaking the law against engine idling hasn’t increased since 2003 – still standing at £20. This means that it’s not economic for councils to enforce compliance and it is no surprise that there is effectively zero enforcement. This is absurd given the time money and effort spent in recent years on raising awareness of air quality issues in Scotland and introducing Low Emission Zones.  We want to see the penalty raised to an effective level, and index-linked to future inflation.

  • ‘Continental-style’ zebras

We want to see cheap, simple zebra crossings (i.e. ‘paint-only’, without Belisha Beacons) permitted on Scottish streets. This is a quick and cost-effective way to give pedestrians priority, especially on side roads where pedestrian priority is now confirmed in the Highway Code. Evaluations of the design by Edinburgh Napier University and Transform Scotland have demonstrate their potential (https://transform.scot/2023/12/04/new-research-would-european-style-zebra-crossings-work-in-scotland/). The Scottish Government says that it has no devolved powers to even trial these zebras – in which case, the Scottish Government must press immediately for such powers.

  • Roadworks

While roadworks are inevitable both for maintenance of streets and to maintain and improve public utilities, they cause severe and often unnecessary problems for all modes of travel – including pedestrians. The Scottish Road Works Commissioner has stated that 2/3 of works are on footways.  This not only disrupts pedestrians (especially disabled people) but also often results in long-lasting damage to roads. We want to see a ‘lane rental’ system introduced, as permitted in England, where the works undertaker pays for the occupation of the road on a daily basis. This will encourage works to be completed as quickly as possible, minimising disruption, and also increase resources available for inspection of works, improving the standard of reinstatements.

  • Safety Cameras

Two thirds of safety cameras (for speeding and red light jumping) in Edinburgh are ‘bagged’ (out of commission);  8 cameras were bagged in 2025 alone. https://www.livingstreetsedinburgh.org.uk/2025/08/25/bagged-speed-and-red-light-cameras-in-edinburgh-result-from-our-foi-request-august-2025/   This sends a green light to motorists that there are no consequences for speeding and jumping lights. Police Scotland, which operates the cameras, bears the cost of maintaining and upgrading them – but receives no income from penalties, which ultimately goes to the UK Treasury. So Police Scotland currently has a financial incentive to minimise the use of cameras, which are an essential tool to encourage safe and legal driving. We want MSPs to lobby for change on a UK basis so that the revenue generated by safety cameras is retained by the enforcement agency – normally Police Scotland.

Living Streets Edinburgh Group

October 2025.

***

LSEG calls (again) for more investment in everyday walking

The Council’s Transport and Environment Committee on 22 May will consider a report recommending priorities to deliver the City Mobility Plan. We’re surprised, and very disappointed, to see no mention of some key initiatives which we were able to get included in the CMP delivery plan. Especially disappointing after the committee decided to freeze footway maintenance while increasing spending on roads, only last month. We’ve therefore sent councillors this message.

Dear Councillor

I’m writing in connection with the report on City Mobility Plan priorities, Item 7.5 on the TEC agenda for 22 May bit.ly/43ktlep  The recommendations do not adequately reflect the CMP’s ambition to effect “a transformational change in walking and wheeling in Edinburgh”.

Over two years ago, two new initiatives were introduced into the Active Travel component of the City Mobility Plan: ‘Action for Better Crossings” (ABC) and the “Edinburgh Accessible Streets Initiative” EASI). These programmes (both proposed by us) finally offered the prospect of a strategic, rather than piecemeal, approach to addressing some of the most fundamental problems with getting around the city as a pedestrian – for example:

  • the time that you have to wait for the green man at traffic lights,
  • the thousands of missing dropped kerbs on pavements,
  • narrow footways, 
  • pavement clutter, etc.

As we understand it, effectively nothing has been done yet to implement either initiative as a coherent programme. We had hoped that they would form a key part of this report. However, there is no mention whatsoever in the report of either ABC or EASI, despite Council having confirmed them as at the heart of CMP policy only last year (see attached).

Instead, some elements of ABC and EASI are simply noted as part of the ‘rolling programme’ in Appendix 4b. Paragraph 4.14 of the report states an expectation that these will be funded at “an overall level roughly equal to recent overall investment”. This isn’t good enough: there is no indication of how much money is budgeted for these schemes; certainly there has been no systematic investment at all in recent years in widening footways. Many of the other aspects like the pedestrian crossing programme and the crucial school streets reviews have huge backlogs owing to lack of resourcing.

These vital programmes need to be considered alongside, and on the same level playing field, as the active travel and public transport listed in Appendix 1. Councillors should be able to consider whether investment in school streets, road safety, ABC or EASI is more or less worthy than these projects, whether they be George Street, Hawthornvale-Salamander Street, the Lindsey Bridge or Dalry 20 Minute Neighbourhood. Otherwise the opportunity to consider where best to invest both staff time and capital funding is lost and a ‘silo’ approach is entrenched.

We also have serious concerns with the overly-complex methodology for assessing projects in Appendix 1. It gives no weighting to walking and wheeling (“top of the travel hierarchy”) and doesn’t sufficiently value schemes relatively modest but important to pedestrians such as Calton Road and the Causey. These projects fail to score highly enough only because work on them has already been “paused’ for years.

However, the fundamental weakness of the report is to take too narrow an approach to evaluating a limited set of projects. We would therefore like to see the report deferred perhaps for two cycles, and a new report brought forward with a more strategic approach to future investment, including the programmes mentioned above.

David Hunter

Convener

Council spend on roads outstrips funding for pavements

Living Streets Edinburgh is calling for a re-set of capital spending to focus on everyday walking, following recent analysis of council budgets by the group which campaigns for everyday walking. While ‘walking and wheeling’ remains top of the transport hierarchy in theory, the percentage of the roads budget spend on footways has in fact fallen year on year since 2022.

Although there was a significant uplift in budgets for footway maintenance following the last council elections in 2022, as promised in the Labour administration’s manifesto, total roads spending has almost doubled. Carriageway maintenance (roads) budgets have continued to increase significantly. With footway budgets at a standstill since then, only 13% of the overall roads budget now goes on footway maintenance, compared to 21% in 2023.

Living Streets Edinburgh Convener David Hunter said: “We know that there’s a lot of concern about potholes and the state of the roads in Edinburgh, but it’s frustrating to see so little of the roads budget targeting pavement improvements. In every city neighbourhood, there are cluttered, narrow pavements full of trip hazards which make it hard for people to get out to the local shops health centre or to catch the bus.

We’re expecting the Council to announce its plans for spending on the City Mobility Plan and active travel shortly. If the Council is serious about getting people out of cars and supporting sustainable, inclusive local communities, it’s got to do more to improve local walking environments.”

LSEG 2024/25: Some highlights and key events

Over the past year, since our last public meeting in May 2024, we’ve been busy!  Some key events and milestones:

May 2024

  • Met Cllr Arthur on our concerns about the impacts on walking and buses for major Meadows-George Street scheme (a theme for many other active travel schemes)

June

  • LSEG stall at Edinburgh Climate Festival, the Meadows. Lots of good conversations and new supporters enlisted.

July

  • LSEG FoI request reveals £85 million active travel underspend planned by Transport Scotland – subsequently, big cuts confirmed by Scottish Government.

September

  • ‘Polwarth roundabout project’ promoted by Merchiston Community Council secures initial funding from Council (£100k) with support from LSEG.
  • LSEG supports Sight Scotland’s call for ‘green man’ phase at Strachan Road (Blackhall) – one of 70+ junctions without any pedestrian facilities on at least one arm.

October

  • Met new Transport Convener, Cllr Stephen Jenkinson (following Scott Arthur’s election as an MP), and Interim Head of Place, Gareth Barwell (following Paul Lawrence’s appointment as Chief Executive) calling for more priority given to walking.
  • Corstorphine LTN, including wider pavements at the primary school, made permanent – minus the Manse Road ‘bus gate’.

November

  • LSEG comment on new Leith Connections cycleway (Hawthornvale-Salamander Street); plans again compromise walking with narrow pavements and poor bus stops.
  • Cowgate fatal collision leads to decision to bring forward evening closure to traffic from 10.00pm (not yet implemented).
  • LSEG establishes from BT the location of 80+ obsolete phone kiosks cluttering pavements which they are committed to removing.
  • Highlighted the problems for pedestrians remaining on Leith Walk and other streets after the tram extension to Newhaven; including challenging inaccurate measurements reported to council which understate how narrow some sections of pavement are.

December:

  • launch of ‘Roseburn-Canal’ (Dundee Street) cycleway: big improvement to Dalry community park and no negative impact on bus users and pedestrians!
  • long-awaited (ie years late!) pedestrian crossings installed at Stockbridge (Leslie Place) and Fountainbridge (Yeaman Place).
  • Met Lothian Centre for Independent Living, who are supporting a group of disabled people and carers advocating for more accessible streets.

January 2025

  • We established a clear process and understanding with the Royal Mail and council on the removal of unused ‘mail pouches’ which add unnecessary clutter to pavements

February 2025

  • Leith Low Traffic Neighbourhood (LTN) confirmed permanent. Significant credit due to our affiliated group ‘Liveable Leith’.
  • We responded to a major consultation on Princes Street expressing disappointment at the lack of proposals to increase the size of pavements and opposing the idea of a cycleway outside the shops, complete with floating bus stops.

March 2025

  • Stall at ‘Schools clean air’ project at City Chambers.
  • Engaging with Equal Footing Porty and supporting their deputation to TEC – another group advocating for accessible streets in Portobello
  • We secured a council motion (by Cllr Aston) calling for a major review of phasing of traffic signals, which have great scope to give more priority to pedestrians (and buses).

April 2025

  • Persistent – but ultimately unsuccessful – efforts to persuade the Council to increase budgets for footway maintenance, tackling dropped kerbs etc. We hope that they have made an impact which will influence future capital budgets. 
  • Commitment secured at TEC (by Cllr Booth) to investigate improved pedestrian routes through Gorgie/Westfield /Roseburn.
  • Welcomed the announcement to introduce significant traffic restrictions on the Lawnmarket/Johnstone Terrace once resurfacing works are complete this summer.
  • We spoke at a major event organised by the Cockburn meeting on city streetscapes on the design and management of the city.

Communications as at April 2025

Local mailing list: 359 members

Social media followers:

X (twitter):      4,999

Facebook:        1,900

BlueSky:            589

***